Welcome, Guest. Please Login
Conservative Chit Chat: A Place to discuss politics
   
The Forum is moving to a new space integrated into the Wordpress Blog, but this old place will remain here for posterity (or in case the wordpress doesn't work out).
  Policy Page Main Site Home Blogs Books Conservative ChitChat Gazette USA boards Merchandise AlltheInterweb Answers Links Directory HelpLoginSearch  
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Reply Add Poll Send Topic Print
The ultimate guide to the AGW scam (Read 54001 times)
Paste User Name in Quick Reply Box Admin-JD
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline



Posts: 213
Gender: male
Re: The ultimate guide to the AGW scam
Reply #34 - Sep 21st, 2019 at 12:03am
Mark & Quote Quote 
Useful comment above an article I saw earlier in the year and been meaning to tag up on this thread:
Quote:
The fact is, there has been global warming, but the contribution of human-generated carbon dioxide is necessarily so small as to be all but undetectable. Here's why:

Carbon dioxide, considered the main vector for human-caused global warming, is some 0.04% of the atmosphere by volume, or some 400 parts per million (ppm)[1]. Water vapor varies from 0% to 4% by volume[2], and so should easily average above 1%[3] near the Earth’s surface, where the greenhouse effect would be most important, and is about three times more effective[4] a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide. So water vapor is some 25 times more prevalent and three times more effective; that makes it some 75 times more important to the greenhouse effect than carbon dioxide[5]. The TOTAL contribution of carbon dioxide to the greenhouse effect is therefore 0.013 or less.

Since the start of the industrial revolution, carbon dioxide is estimated to have risen from 280 ppm to the current approximately 400 ppm. Even if the entire increase were the result of human emissions - which is by no means certain, given uncertainty about how much CO2 is produced by natural sources such as decomposition of biomass and carbonate rock, volcanism and the little-understood ocean-atmosphere exchange - the total human contribution to atmospheric carbon dioxide would be about 0.3 of the total. Therefore human carbon dioxide adds at most only 0.0039 of the greenhouse effect, and may well be less.

Total warming of the Earth by the greenhouse effect is widely accepted as about 33 degrees Centigrade or 59 degrees Fahrenheit, raising average temperature to 15 degrees Centigrade, or 59 degrees above zero Fahrenheit. So the contribution of anthropogenic carbon dioxide is at most 0.23 degrees Fahrenheit, or at most 0.13 degree Centigrade, and perhaps considerably less. Global warming since the beginning of the industrial revolution is thought by many to be perhaps 0.8 to1.0 degree Centigrade.
But that's only the beginning. We've had global warming for more than 10,000 years, since the end of the last Ice Age, and there is evidence temperatures were actually somewhat warmer 9,000 years ago and again 4,500 to 8,000 years ago than they are today[6]. Whatever caused that, it was not human activity. It was not all those power plants and factories and SUVs being operated by Stone Age cavemen while chipping arrowheads out of bits of flint. Whatever the cause was, it melted the glaciers that in North America once extended south to Long Island and parts of New York City[7] into virtually complete disappearance (except for a few mountain remnants). That's one big greenhouse effect! If we are still having global warming - and I suppose we could presume we are, given this more than 10,000 year history - it seems highly likely that it is still the overwhelmingly primary cause of continued warming, rather than our piddling 0.0039 contribution to the greenhouse effect.
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Paste User Name in Quick Reply Box Admin-JD
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline



Posts: 213
Gender: male
Re: The ultimate guide to the AGW scam
Reply #35 - Sep 24th, 2019 at 4:41pm
Mark & Quote Quote 
Climate Scientists Write To UN: There Is No Climate Emergency
Quote:
A group of 500 esteemed scientists and professionals in climate science have officially notified the United Nations that there is no climate crisis and that spending trillions on a non-problem is ‘cruel and imprudent’.
This letter will not make it into national or global media, nor will it cause the UN to change its ways. If these same scientists understood Technocracy, they would change their battle strategy. ⁃ TN Editor

Read More....
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Paste User Name in Quick Reply Box Admin-JD
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline



Posts: 213
Gender: male
Re: The ultimate guide to the AGW scam
Reply #36 - Sep 24th, 2019 at 4:49pm
Mark & Quote Quote 
ConservativeChitChat has a new policy page for Climate, Environment and Conservation issues HERE on the Blogs.

We also have a new Daily Newsletter for Climate and Conservation on Paper.li alongside our existing ones.
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Paste User Name in Quick Reply Box Admin-JD
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline



Posts: 213
Gender: male
Re: The ultimate guide to the AGW scam
Reply #37 - Sep 24th, 2019 at 4:56pm
Mark & Quote Quote 
Top Climate Scientist Criticizes ‘Nonsense’ Of ‘Global Warming Crisis’
Quote:
A highly qualified and experienced climate modeler with impeccable credentials has rejected the unscientific bases of the doom-mongering over a purported climate crisis.

His work has not yet been picked up in this country, but that is about to change.

Writing in the Australian site Quadrant, Tony Thomas introduces the English-Speaking world to the truth-telling of Dr. Mototaka Nakamura. (hat tip: Andrew Bolt, John McMahon)


There’s a top-level oceanographer and meteorologist who is  prepared to cry “Nonsense!”on the “global warming crisis” evident to climate modellers but not in the real world.

He’s as well or better qualified than the modellers he criticises — the ones whose Year 2100 forebodings of 4degC warming have set the world to spending $US1.5 trillion a year to combat CO2 emissions.

The iconoclast is Dr. Mototaka Nakamura. In June he put out a small book in Japanese on “the sorry state of climate science”. It’s titled Confessions of a climate scientist: the global warming hypothesis is an unproven hypothesis, and he is very much qualified to take a stand.

From 1990 to 2014 he worked on cloud dynamics and forces mixing atmospheric and ocean flows on medium to planetary scales. His bases were MIT (for a Doctor of Science in meteorology), Georgia Institute of Technology, Goddard Space Flight Centre, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Duke and Hawaii Universities and the Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology. He’s published about 20 climate papers on fluid dynamics.

Today’s vast panoply of “global warming science” is like an upside down pyramid built on the work of a few score of serious climate modellers. They claim to have demonstrated human-derived CO2 emissions as the cause of recent global warming and project that warming forward. Every orthodox climate researcher takes such output from the modellers’ black boxes as a given.

Read More....
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Reply Add Poll Send Topic Print
The ultimate guide to the AGW scam
Open Live Preview Live Preview


You can resize the message area by dragging the right- or bottom border.
                       
Max 3500 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features

      

AlltheInterweb | AlltheInterweb Directory | AlltheInterweb Search | More Forums
ConservativeChitChat.co.uk | ConservativeChitChat USA | ConservativeChitChat Scotland