Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
Conservative Chit Chat: A Place to discuss politics
   
  Main Site Home Blogs Books Conservative ChitChat Gazette USA boards Merchandise AlltheInterweb Answers Links Directory HelpLoginRegisterSearch Dating  
 
Pages: 1 2 
Reply Add Poll Send Topic Print
The ultimate guide to the AGW scam (Read 46405 times)
Paste User Name in Quick Reply Box Admin-JD
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline



Posts: 209
Gender: male
Re: The ultimate guide to the AGW scam
Reply #17 - Jun 24th, 2014 at 4:32am
Mark & Quote Quote 
Global Warming 'Fabricated' by NASA and NOAA
Quote:
Scientists at two of the world’s leading climate centres - NASA and NOAA - have been caught out manipulating temperature data to overstate the extent of the 20th century "global warming".

The evidence of their tinkering can clearly be seen at Real Science, where blogger Steven Goddard has posted a series of graphs which show "climate change" before and after the adjustments.

When the raw data is used, there is little if any evidence of global warming and some evidence of global cooling. However, once the data has been adjusted - ie fabricated by computer models -  20th century 'global warming' suddenly looks much more dramatic.

Read More.....
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Paste User Name in Quick Reply Box Admin-JD
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline



Posts: 209
Gender: male
Re: The ultimate guide to the AGW scam
Reply #18 - Sep 24th, 2014 at 2:37am
Mark & Quote Quote 
To keep track of what's really going on with the climate, subscribe to our "Climate Real" Twitter list... https://twitter.com/ConservativeCCh/lists/climate-real
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Paste User Name in Quick Reply Box Admin-JD
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline



Posts: 209
Gender: male
Re: The ultimate guide to the AGW scam
Reply #19 - Oct 14th, 2014 at 5:47pm
Mark & Quote Quote 
Yet another significicant paper finds low climate sensitivity to CO2, suggesting there is no global warming crisis at hand
Quote:
Hot on the heels of the Lewis and Curry paper, we have this new paper, which looks to be well researched, empirically based, and a potential blockbuster for dimming the alarmism that has been so prevalent over climate sensitivity. With a climate sensitivity of just 0.43°C, it takes the air out of the alarmism balloon.

The Hockey Schtick writes: A new paper published in the Open Journal of Atmospheric and Climate Change by renowned professor of physics and expert on spectroscopy Dr. Hermann Harde finds that climate sensitivity to a doubling of CO2 levels is only about [0.6C], about 7 times less than the IPCC claims, but in line with many other published low estimates of climate sensitivity.

Read More....
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Paste User Name in Quick Reply Box Admin-JD
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline



Posts: 209
Gender: male
Re: The ultimate guide to the AGW scam
Reply #20 - Oct 30th, 2014 at 2:49am
Mark & Quote Quote 
CLIMATE CHANGE IS NOT OUR FAULT, SO LET’S JUST DEAL WITH IT, SAYS CALIFORNIA PROFESSOR
Quote:
Climate change is happening – but not because of human activity, Daniel Botkin, professor Emeritus in the Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology at University of California Santa Barbara has said. Moreover, the focus on man-made global warming is detracting attention from real environmental disasters to nature’s detriment, he has argued.

Read More...
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Paste User Name in Quick Reply Box Admin-JD
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline



Posts: 209
Gender: male
Re: The ultimate guide to the AGW scam
Reply #21 - Jan 30th, 2015 at 4:40pm
Mark & Quote Quote 
FORGET CLIMATEGATE: THIS ‘GLOBAL WARMING’ SCANDAL IS MUCH BIGGER
Quote:
So before I go into technical detail about why the temperature records are suspect, let me provide an analogy which ought to make it perfectly clear to any neutral parties reading this why the problem I’m about to describe ought not to be consigned to the realms of crackpottery.

Suppose say, that for the last 100 years my family have been maintaining a weather station at the bottom of our garden, diligently recording the temperatures day by day, and that what these records show is this: that in the 1930s it was jolly hot – even hotter than in the 1980s; that since the 1940s it has been cooling.

What conclusions would you draw from this hard evidence?

Well the obvious one, I imagine, is that the dramatic Twentieth Century warming that people like Al Gore have been banging on about is a crock. At least according to this particular weather station it is.

Now how would you feel if you went and took these temperature records along to one of the world’s leading global warming experts – say Gavin Schmidt at NASA or Phil Jones at CRU or Michael Mann at Penn State – and they studied your records for a moment and said: “This isn’t right.” What if they then crossed out all your temperature measurements, did a few calculations on the back of an envelope, and scribbled in their amendments? And you studied those adjustments and you realised, to your astonishment, that the new, pretend temperature measurements told an entirely different story from the original, real temperature measurements: that where before your records showed a cooling since the 1940s they now showed a warming trend.

You’d be gobsmacked, would you not?

Yet, incredible though it may seem, the scenario I’ve just described is more or less exactly analogous to what has happened to the raw data from weather stations all over the world.

Read Full Story....
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Paste User Name in Quick Reply Box Admin-JD
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline



Posts: 209
Gender: male
Re: The ultimate guide to the AGW scam
Reply #22 - Feb 25th, 2015 at 3:50pm
Mark & Quote Quote 
LEFT PANICS OVER PEER-REVIEWED CLIMATE PAPER’S THREAT TO GLOBAL WARMING ALARMISM
Quote:
You’ve heard it said that the science is settled. And it’s true. It is settled–settled beyond the possibility of any dispute. A fundamental, inescapable, indubitable bedrock scientific principle is that lousy theories make lousy predictions.

Climate forecasts are lousy, therefore it is settled science that they must necessarily be based on lousy theories. And lousy theories should not be trusted.

Put it this way. Climate forecasts, of the type relied upon by the IPCC and over governmental entities, stink. They are no good. They have been promising ever increasing temperatures for decades, but the observations have been more or less steady.

Read More...
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Paste User Name in Quick Reply Box Admin-JD
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline



Posts: 209
Gender: male
Re: The ultimate guide to the AGW scam
Reply #23 - Apr 22nd, 2015 at 4:10pm
Mark & Quote Quote 
'We could DOUBLE Co2 emissions and still NOT reach critical global warming limit'
Quote:
MANKIND could DOUBLE its carbon dioxide emissions and the Earth still WON'T reach a critical level of global warming, claims researcher Dr Benny Peiser.


Quote:
The planet is currently in the midst of a so-called warming pause, with satellite measurements showing that the surface temperature may not have risen for just over 18 years.

Despite this apparent hiatus in temperature rising, leaders from around the world are due to meet in Paris later this year for the United Nations Climate Summit.

The leaders are expected to reaffirm their target of keeping the global average temperature within 2°C of pre-industrial levels.

Speaking ahead of the conference, Dr Peiser, the director of the Global Warming Policy Forum - a think tank set up to challenge the policies envisaged by governments to mitigate global warming - described this target as reasonable although he suggested that it should remain flexible to reflect the unpredictability of climate change.

However, he also claimed that with our current rates of carbon dioxide (Co2) emissions, we could be nowhere near to reaching that critical level.

Read the rest of it...
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Paste User Name in Quick Reply Box Admin-JD
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline



Posts: 209
Gender: male
Re: The ultimate guide to the AGW scam
Reply #24 - Sep 24th, 2015 at 5:40pm
Mark & Quote Quote 
While the forums were suffering from technical gremlins, a global warmingist made this confession:
Burn ALL the COAL, OIL – NO danger of SEA LEVEL rise this century from Antarctic ice melt
Quote:
One of the world's most firmly global-warmist scientists says that even if humanity deliberately sets out to burn all the fossil fuels it can find, as fast as it can, there will be no troublesome sea level rise due to melting Antarctic ice this century.

Dr Ken Caldeira's credentials as a global warmist are impeccable. He is not a true green hardliner - he has signed a plea to his fellow greens to get over their objections to nuclear power, for instance, and he doesn't totally rule out geoengineering as a possible global-warming solution. But that's as far as he'll go: in Dr Caldeira's view, it is plain and simple unethical to release greenhouse gases into the air. There's no middle ground on that as far as he's concerned - he's not OK with gas power as an alternative to coal, for instance.


Alternate article.....
IF WE BURNED ALL THE WORLD’S FOSSIL FUELS TOMORROW GUESS WHAT WOULD HAPPEN TO SEA LEVELS……A big fat NOTHING.
Quote:
Or at least as close to nothing as makes no difference – says a new study published at Science Advances.

If we were to burn all the world’s coal and all the world’s oil tomorrow, the resultant effect on the Antarctic ice sheet – the biggest body of ice on the planet – would be to cause sea levels to rise by the end of this century by just 8cm.

What this means, in other words, is that even were the doomiest of doomsday predictions about climate change and rising sea levels to come true, they would take place on a timescale so slow that no one alive on the planet right now would be remotely affected.

Nor their children, nor their grandchildren, nor their great-grandchildren. It will take till at least 2200 for sea levels to rise even a metre – giving our ingenious future generations plenty of time to build their escape space ships, or roll up their trouser legs, or move a half a mile inland, or whatever they deem necessary to cope with the gently-rising waters.
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Paste User Name in Quick Reply Box Admin-JD
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline



Posts: 209
Gender: male
Re: The ultimate guide to the AGW scam
Reply #25 - Sep 24th, 2015 at 5:42pm
Mark & Quote Quote 
Also while the forums were glitching.....
MORE BAD NEWS FOR CLIMATE ALARMISTS: ANOTHER STUDY CONFIRMS AFRICA’S DESERTS ARE GETTING GREENER
Quote:
Climate change has saved hundreds of thousands of Africans from extreme poverty, starvation and premature death, a study from Arizona State University has confirmed.

The study shows that the West African Sahel – part of the semiarid strip just south of the Sahara desert, which spans the African continent from the Atlantic Ocean to the Red Sea – has been steadily “regreening” since the severe droughts of the 1970s and 1980s which killed more than 100,000 people.

Among the reasons for the “regreening” are increased rainfall, the beneficial effects of increased atmospheric CO2 on plant growth and the ingenuity of farmers (“community-led conservation efforts) in this harsh, marginal region.
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Paste User Name in Quick Reply Box Admin-JD
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline



Posts: 209
Gender: male
Re: The ultimate guide to the AGW scam
Reply #26 - Sep 24th, 2015 at 5:44pm
Mark & Quote Quote 
For daily doses of Environmental news, subscribe to our sister site's Green Crap News Newsletter.
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Paste User Name in Quick Reply Box Admin-JD
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline



Posts: 209
Gender: male
Re: The ultimate guide to the AGW scam
Reply #27 - Oct 2nd, 2015 at 8:01pm
Mark & Quote Quote 
Global warming SHOCK: Earth’s natural coolant could be TWICE as powerful as first thought
Quote:
A NATURAL cooling process which reverses the effects of global warming could be nearly TWICE as powerful as scientists previously believed.


Quote:
Research has identified a natural system where volatile organic compounds (VOC) are emitted into the air from the sea.

These VOCs cause the climate to cool and may explain why world temperatures have remained stable for around 15 years, despite widespread claims that global warming is out of control.

The German government's Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research found a key VOC known as Isoprene, which was only thought to have been produced by living organisms such as plankton, is actually also created by the sun hitting chemicals at the top of the ocean.

Measurements had estimated 1.9 megatons of isoprene was emitted each year but the new, groundbreaking discovery shows an increase of between 0.2 and 3.5 megatons annually.
Critics of climate change say the research - published in the journal Environmental Science and Technology - throws previous estimates of rising temperatures into doubt.
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Paste User Name in Quick Reply Box Admin-JD
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline



Posts: 209
Gender: male
Re: The ultimate guide to the AGW scam
Reply #28 - Oct 13th, 2015 at 8:16pm
Mark & Quote Quote 
TOP PHYSICIST Dr. FREEMAN DYSON: OBAMA HAS PICKED THE ‘WRONG SIDE’ ON CLIMATE CHANGE
Quote:
The climate models used by alarmist scientists to predict global warming are getting worse, not better; carbon dioxide does far more good than harm; and President Obama has backed the “wrong side” in the war on “climate change.”

So says one of the world’s greatest theoretical physicists, Dr Freeman Dyson (pictured above), the British-born, naturalised American citizen who worked at Princeton University as a contemporary of Einstein and has advised the US government on a wide range of scientific and technical issues.
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Paste User Name in Quick Reply Box Admin-JD
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline



Posts: 209
Gender: male
Re: The ultimate guide to the AGW scam
Reply #29 - Nov 24th, 2015 at 3:49pm
Mark & Quote Quote 
German Professor: NASA Has Fiddled Climate Data On ‘Unbelievable’ Scale
Quote:
A German professor has confirmed what skeptics from Britain to the US have long suspected: that NASA’s Goddard Institute of Space Studies has largely invented “global warming” by tampering with the raw temperature data records.

Professor Dr. Friedrich Karl Ewert is a retired geologist and data computation expert. He has painstakingly examined and tabulated all NASA GISS’s temperature data series, taken from 1153 stations and going back to 1881. His conclusion: that if you look at the raw data, as opposed to NASA’s revisions, you’ll find that since 1940 the planet has been cooling, not warming.

Read More.....
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Paste User Name in Quick Reply Box Admin-JD
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline



Posts: 209
Gender: male
Re: The ultimate guide to the AGW scam
Reply #30 - Dec 14th, 2015 at 12:32am
Mark & Quote Quote 
Why the Paris climate treaty will be the flop of the year
Quote:
Now, as Paris approaches – although scarcely noticed by the Western media – we can see just what the 20 countries responsible for 81 per cent of global CO2 emissions are proposing as their “Intended Nationally Determined Contributions” to cutting emissions by 2030. These have been meticulously analysed on the Notalotofpeopleknowthat website, with further reporting on that site of the Global Warming Policy Foundation.
China, now easily the world’s largest emitter, contributing 24 per cent of the total, plans by 2030 to double its CO2 emissions, not least by building 363 more coal-fired power stations. India, now the third-largest emitter, plans by 2030 to treble its emissions. The fourth-largest emitter, Russia, despite slashing its emissions after 1990 by closing down much of its old Soviet industry, now proposes to increase them from their 2012 level by up to 38 per cent.
Japan, the fifth-largest emitter, does claim that it will cut its emissions by some 15 per cent, but is still planning to build more coal-fired power plants. Although South Korea, the world’s seventh-largest emitter, claims that it will cut emissions by 23 per cent (not least by buying “carbon credits” that will allow it to “offset” its continuing production of CO2 for cash), even its proposed target will still be 100 per cent higher than it was 25 years ago.
As for the Middle East, the oil states such as Saudi Arabia and Iran (the eighth and ninth-largest emitters) have not yet submitted any proposals. But the United Arab Emirates, which have more than doubled their emissions since 2002, show no sign of slowing that increase, apart from a promise to invest in more “carbon-free” solar and nuclear power. As for Brazil, which as the 11th largest emitter has been rapidly increasing its dependence on fossil fuels, it sees its main contribution as being to slow the felling and burning of the Amazon rainforest.

So which countries are obviously missing from this list? President Obama may talk the talk about his ambitious plans for the US, the world’s second-largest emitter. But there is no more chance of Congress agreeing to the proposed treaty than there was in 1997, when the Senate unanimously voted no to Kyoto.
All of which leaves the EU as the only part of the world committed to cutting its emissions by 40 per cent within 15 years. Even here, Poland is already refusing to sign the treaty, as it builds more fossil-fuel power stations to keep its lights on, while Germany, the sixth-largest emitter does the same.
The only government in the world wholly committed to meeting that 40 per cent target by 2030 is Britain, the 14th-largest emitter, responsible for just 1.3 per cent of global emissions. This is less than China or India are now adding every year, as we shut down those fossil-fuel power plants that still manage to provide 70 per cent of our electricity.

Read Full Article...
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Paste User Name in Quick Reply Box Admin-JD
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline



Posts: 209
Gender: male
Re: The ultimate guide to the AGW scam
Reply #31 - Dec 14th, 2015 at 12:36am
Mark & Quote Quote 
Admin-JD wrote on Dec 14th, 2015 at 12:32am:
Why the Paris climate treaty will be the flop of the year
Read Full Article...


And indeed it was....
The Paris Climate deal addresses 1pc of the problem. How is that a victory?
Quote:
The  Paris deal promises to keep temperature rises below 2°C. However, the actual promises made here will do almost nothing to achieve that. It is widely accepted that to keep temperature rises below 2°C, we have to reduce CO₂ emissions by 6,000Gt. The UNFCCC estimates that if every country makes every single promised Paris deal carbon cut by 2030 to the fullest extent possible and there is no carbon leakage, CO₂ emissions will be cut by 56 Gt by 2030.

The maths is simple: in an implausibly optimistic best-case scenario, Paris leaves 99pc of the problem in place. To say that Paris will get us to “well below 2°C” is cynical posturing at best. It relies on wishful thinking. It’s like going on a diet to slim down, but declaring victory after the first salad.

Read more....
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Paste User Name in Quick Reply Box Admin-JD
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline



Posts: 209
Gender: male
Re: The ultimate guide to the AGW scam
Reply #32 - Dec 21st, 2015 at 4:39pm
Mark & Quote Quote 
Climate change shock: Burning fossil fuels 'COOLS planet', says NASA
Quote:
Major theories about what causes temperatures to rise have been thrown into doubt after NASA found the Earth has cooled in areas of heavy industrialisation where more trees have been lost and more fossil fuel burning takes place.

Environmentalists have long argued the burning of fossil fuels in power stations and for other uses is responsible for global warming and predicted temperature increases because of the high levels of carbon dioxide produced - which causes the global greenhouse effect.

Read More...
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Paste User Name in Quick Reply Box Admin-JD
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline



Posts: 209
Gender: male
Re: The ultimate guide to the AGW scam
Reply #33 - Oct 7th, 2018 at 12:39pm
Mark & Quote Quote 
Climate Bombshell: Global Warming Scare Is Based on ‘Careless and Amateur’ Data, Finds Audit
Quote:
The first ever audit of the world’s most important temperature data set has found it to be so riddled with errors that it is effectively useless.
HadCRUT4 is the primary dataset used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to make its dramatic claims about “man-made global warming”, to justify its demands for trillions of dollars to be spent on “combating climate change” and as the basis for the Paris Climate Accord.

But according to a groundbreaking analysis by Australian researcher John McLean it’s far too sloppy to be taken seriously even by climate scientists, let alone a body as influential as the IPCC or by the governments of the world.
Read More.....
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Reply Add Poll Send Topic Print
The ultimate guide to the AGW scam
Open Live Preview Live Preview


You can resize the message area by dragging the right- or bottom border.
                       
Max 3500 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features

      

AlltheInterweb | AlltheInterweb Directory | AlltheInterweb Search | More Forums
ConservativeChitChat.co.uk | ConservativeChitChat USA | ConservativeChitChat Scotland